Protesting Bill Clinton: Video From a Heckler’s Point of View

“How dare you”

Stumping for his wife at a campaign fundraiser in Minneapolis, former president Bill Clinton made the news recently for his blunt admonishment of 9/11 Truthers who were shouting during his speech.

News coverage of the event

The statements made by the protesters addressed concern over the following topics:

A longer video of the event was released on the activist We Are Change website. Those who do not publicly protest and have only seen protesters on television might find this longer version interesting.

Filmed by the protesters themselves, during one split screen scene the first-person camera angle elicits a feeling as if the audience members–disgruntled by the outbursts–are looking back directly at you the viewer, as if you are the protester. Very ‘Being John Malkovich‘.

‘We Are Change’ video of the event

Self-described anti-globalization and anti-privatization activists, the We Are Change website admits they don’t have all the answers:

“We are CHANGE. We are about education, motivation and activation. We do not know all of the answers, but we seek to redefine and reinvigorate the distribution of information. We recognize that the world does not function through a left/right paradigm, but a top/down hierarchy that threatens to destroy free society as we know it. As students of history we recognize the perils of continued globalization and it’s deceptive philosophy. Privatization does not equal progress.”

The heckling appears to have achieved mixed results. While some, like this website, have chosen to note the purpose of the protests, the former president is a master of public speaking and succinctly slapped them down. “How dare you” resonated much louder than the random topics blurted out in protest, as news coverage of the event demonstrated.

But right or wrong, answers or no answers, We Are Change certainly spread their message. Just like their website said they would.

*

More on Bill Clinton, Politics

    http://www.btinternet.com/~digital.wallpapers/desktops/bill_clinton.jpg

    Bill Maher Hounded by 9/11 Theorists; Ejects Audience Member

    “In that instance I’m actually defending President Bush…And cows disagree with me.”

    Bill Maher offers up one of the most rationale voices on television, calling out those on the far-left and far-right for their obtuse opinions. At the live broadcast of his October 19, 2007 episode of HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher, Maher helped expel a shouting ‘9/11 Truther’ from the audience who was interrupting the show.

    9/11 Truthers‘, while right to challenge and be skeptical of the government, go too far for Maher and he says so.

    WARNING:

    Strong Language

    “Crazy people who still think the government brought down the twin towers in a controlled explosion have to stop pretending that I’m the one being naive.”

    To put on a 9/11 conpiracy hat for a moment, though improbable, is possible that the green President Bush ordered the destruction of United Airlines Flight 93 and covered it up, indoctrinating himself into a long six years of self-approved governmental secrecy.

    While extremely doubtful, there is no way to really know and little evidence to prove that theory (amongst hundreds of other theories), but that doesn’t stop people from trying. And face it, alternative histories are intriguing, and since much of history is inaccurate or at minimum incomplete, filling in the gaps is enticing to some.

    But ultimately some people are comfortable with the unknowable and some are not.

    Therein lies the rub. Since the government does keep secrets from its citizens, we have to speculate, and people have an insatiable desire to make connections and fill in the gaps; just think of religion.

    Maher is certainly comfortable with the unknowable and says so.

    “Everywhere I go people say to me: ‘Why don’t you cover on your show what really happened on 9/11′ .”

    Everywhere I live Mormons in sacred underwear knock on my door asking me to join them. That’s annoying too.

    “In that instance I’m actually defending President Bush. I don’t think President Bush brought down the World Trade Center. And cows disagree with me.”

    Widely publicized excerpt from Real Time with Bill Maher, October 19, 2007, when the host helps eject a 9/11 Truther.

    A reminder of what it is all about. Rare footage of the 9/11 attack.


    Like it or not, conspiracy theories will persist long after President Bush vacates the White House. In the above video the president is speaking at the United Nations saying something you wouldn’t think he would have to say, overdubbed with 9/11 Truther narration.

    In the end we’re all hounded by the unknowable, by ourselves or through others.

    Haven’t had your conspiracy theory fill yet? Fret not, I’ve got my own wacky theory to sink your teeth in.

    *

    Bonus:

    Gary Kasparov on Real Time after the 9/11 truther ejection:


    Category: Bill Maher

    http://msnbcmedia2.msn.com/j/ap/d9b23297-153b-4520-ad74-6490312f8f3e.widec.jpg

    Five-Year Anniversary of Iraq War


    President George W. Bush remarks on the passage of a House resolution authorizing him to use military force in Iraq during a press conference in the Roosevelt Room Thursday, Oct. 10, 2002. White House photo by Paul Morse. -White House website

    “This is a debate and a decision that all Americans can be proud of.”

    Feel proud?

    It has been five years since the Congress enacted a resolution to authorize the Iraq war. Yes, it has been five long years, and five years ago yesterday President Bush stated:

    I would like to thank the members of the House of Representatives, just as I thanked Speaker Hastert and Leader Gephardt a few minutes ago, for the very strong bipartisan vote authorizing the use of force in Iraq if it becomes necessary.

    The House debate was conducted in the best traditions of the United States Congress. It was spirited, it was civil, and it was informed. This is a debate and a decision that all Americans can be proud of.

    To commemorate the anniversary of this foreign policy disaster, ThinkProgress in its wisdom posted the following graph with the prefice, “Here is the list of 133 House members who courageously voted no” to granting President Bush military power all those long years ago:

    In light of the anniversary, the Garling Gauge offers this tiny pictorial montage of the Iraq war. While those authorizing the war presumably had good intentions, all wars are crimes.

    WARNING: GRAPHIC IMAGES
















    Abu Ghraib

    Shame on us.

    *

    Iraq War: Why Defunding is Politically Viable

    ACLU

    http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
    http://tinyurl.com/yqxg9t

    Another 9/11 Passes


    Tribute in Light from Liberty State Park, The Falling Man. Photo-Richard Drew

    Preventable.

    On this eve of the September 11, 2001 attacks, the Garling Gauge re-posts its first article. Sadly as timely now as it was in May:

    Another Ignorant President?

    Earth to Giuliani: Action creates reaction

    Presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani asserts blinding ignorance in his rebuke of Congressman Ron Paul at the second Republican debate.

    That the audience would clap loudest at such a myopic comment made by the Republican front runner is as equally telling as it is troubling.

    The last thing voters need is more lies about the effects of American foreign policy.

    The last thing America needs is another ill-informed, grandstanding President.

    Republicans, sadly, continue to display their dimness to the power and consequences of American actions around the world.

    Our country is in deep need of thoughtfulness on the world stage. It is time for the adults to take over: It is time to elect a Democrat.


    Commentary on the Republican debate:

    People like Rudy Guiliani & Ben Furgeson are partially why the world is a more dangerous place.

    *

    See also: Another 9/11 Helps US?
    See original posting: Another Ignorant President?

    http://tinyurl.com/yu26ep
    http://tinyurl.com/32e3ny

    Transcription of Osama Bin Laden Video, September, 2007


    World’s most wanted man: Exiled Saudi dissident Osama bin Laden, April 1998, Afghanistan.

    Transcripts of video below

    PDF Transcript (takes a minute to load)

    All praise is due to Allah, who built the heavens and earth in justice, and created man as a favor and grace from Him. And from His ways is that the days rotate between the people, and from His Law is retaliation in kind: an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth and the killer is killed. And all praise is due to Allah, who awakened His slaves’ desire for the Garden, and all of them will enter it except those who refuse. And whoever obeys Him alone in all of his affairs will enter the Garden, and whoever disobeys Him will have refused.As for what comes after: Peace be upon he who follows the Guidance. People of America: I shall be speaking to you on important topics which concern you, so lend me your ears. I begin by discussing the war which is between us and some of its repercussions for us and you.

    To preface, I say: despite America being the greatest economic power and possessing the most powerful and up-to-date military arsenal as well; and despite it spending on this war and its army more than the entire world spends on its armies; and despite it being the major state influencing the policies of the world, as if it has a monopoly on the unjust right of veto; despite all of this, 19 young men were able - by the grace of Allah, the Most High - to change the direction of its compass. And in fact, the subject of the Mujahideen has become an inseparable part of the speech of your leader, and the effects and signs of that are not hidden.

    Since the 11th, many of America’s policies have come under the influence of the Mujahideen, and that is by the grace of Allah, the Most High. And as a result, the people discovered the truth about it, its reputation worsened, its prestige was broken globally and it was bled dry economically, even if our interests overlap with the interests of the major corporations and also with those of the neoconservatives, despite the differing intentions.

    And for your information media, during the first years of the war, lost its credibility and manifested itself as a tool of the colonialist empires, and its condition has often been worse than the condition of the media of the dictatorial regimes which march in the caravan of the single leader.

    Then Bush talks about his working with al-Maliki and his government to spread freedom in Iraq but he is in fact is working with the leaders of one sect against another sect, in the belief that this will quickly decide the war in his favor.

    And thus, what is called the civil war came into being and matters worsened at his hands before getting out of his control and him becoming like the one who plows and sows the sea: he harvests nothing but failure.

    So these are some of the results of the freedom about whose spreading he is talking to you. And then the backtracking of Bush on his insistence on not giving the United Nations expanded jurisdiction in Iraq is an implicit admission of his loss and defeat there.

    And among the most important items contained in Bush’s speeches since the events of the 11th is that the Americans have no options but to continue this war. This tone is in fact an echoing of the words of neoconservatives like Cheney, Rumsfeld and Richard Perle, the latter having said previously that the Americans have no choice in front of them other than to continue the war or face a holocaust.

    I say, refuting this unjust statement, that the morality and culture of the holocaust is your culture, not our culture. In fact, burning living beings is forbidden in our religion, even if they be small like the ant, so what of man?! The holocaust of the Jews was carried out by your brethren in the middle of Europe, but had it been closer to our countries, most of the Jews would have been saved by takng refuge with us. And my proof for that is in what your brothers, the Spanish, did when they set up the horrible courts of the Inquisition to try Muslims and Jews, when the Jews only found safe shelter by taking refuge in our countries. And that is why the Jewish community in Morocco today is one of the largest communities in the world. They are alive with us and we have not incinerated them, but we are a people who don’t sleep under oppression and reject humiliation and disgrace, and we take revenge on the people of tyranny and aggression, and the blood of the Muslims will not be spilled with impunity, and the morrow is night for he who awaits.

    Also, your Christian brothers have been living among us for 14 centuries in Egypt alone, there are millions of Christians whom we have not incinerated and shall not incinerate. But the fact is, there is a continuing and biased campaign being waged against us for a long time now by your politicians and many of your writers by way of your media, especially Hollywood, for the purpose of misrepresenting Islam and its adherents to drive you away from the true religion. The genocide of peoples and their holocausts took place at your hands: only a few specimens of Red Indians were spared, and just a few days ago, the Japanese observed the 62nd anniversary of the annihilation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by your nuclear weapons.

    And among the things which catch the eye of the one who considers the repercussions of your unjust war against Iraq is the failure of your democratic system, despite it raising of the slogans of justice, liberty, equality and humanitarianism. It has not only failed to achieve these things, it has actually destroyed these and other concepts with its weapons - especially in Iraq and Afghanistan - in a brazen fashion, to replace them with fear, destruction, killing, hunger, illness, displacement and more than a million orphans in Baghdad alone, not to mention hundreds of thousands of widows. American statistics speak of the killing of more than 650,000 of the people of Iraq as a result of the war and its repercussions.

    People of America: the world is following your news in regards to your invasion of Iraq, for people have recently come to know that, after several years of the tragedies of this war, the vast majority of you want it stopped. Thus, you elected the Democratic Party for this purpose, but the Democrats haven’t made a move worth mentioning. On the contrary, they continue to agree to the spending of tens of billions to continue the killing and war there, which has led to the vast majority of you being afflicted with disappointment.

    And here is the gist of the matter, so one should pause, think and reflect: why have the Democrats failed to stop this war, despite them being the majority?

    I will come back to reply to this question after raising another question, which is:

    Why are the leaders of the White House keen to start wars and wage them around the world, and make use of every possible opportunity through which they can reach this purpose, occasionally even creating justifications based on deception and blatant lies, as you saw Iraq?

    In the Vietnam War, the leaders of the White House claimed at the time that it was a necessary and crucial war, and during it, Rumsfeld and his aides murdered two million villagers. And when Kennedy took over the presidency and deviated from the general line of policy drawn up for the White House and wanted to stop this unjust war, that angered the owners of the major corporations who were benefiting from its continuation.

    And so Kennedy was killed, and al-Qaeda wasn’t present at that time, but rather, those corporations were the primary beneficiary from his killing. And the war continued after that for approximately one decade. But after it became clear to you that it was an unjust and unnecessary war, you made one of your greatest mistakes, in that you neither brought to account nor punished those who waged this war, not even the most violent of its murderers, Rumsfeld. And even more incredible than that is that Bush picked him as secretary of defense in his first term after picking Cheney as his vice-president, Powell as secretary of state and Armitage as Powell’s deputy, despite their horrific and bloody history of murdering humans. So that was a clear signal that his administration - the administration of the generals - didn’t have as its main concern the serving of humanity, but rather, was interested in bringing about new massacres. Yet in spite of that, you permitted Bush to complete his first term, and stranger still, chose him for a second term, which gave him a clear mandate from you - with your full knowledge and consent - to continue to murder our people in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Then you claim to be innocent! This innocence of yours is like my innocence of the blood of your sons of the 11th - were I to claim such a thing. But it is impossible for me to humor any of you in the arrogance and indifference you show for the lives of humans outside America, or for me to humor your leaders in their lying, as the entire world knows they have the lion’s share of that. These morals aren’t our morals. What I want to emphasize here is that not taking past war criminals to account led to them repeating that crime of killing humanity without right and waging this unjust war in Mesopotamia, and as a result, here are the oppressed ones today continuing to take their right from you.

    This war was entirely unnecessary, as testified to by your own reports. And among the most capable of those from your side who speak to you on this topic and on the manufacturing of public opinion is Noam Chomsky, who spoke sober words of advice prior to the war, but the leader of Texas doesn’t like those who give advice. The entire world came out in unprecedented demonstrations to warn against waging the war and describe its true nature in eloquent terms like “no to spilling red blood for black oil,” yet he paid them no heed. It is time for humankind to know that talk of the rights of man and freedom are lies produced by the White House and its allies in Europe to deceive humans, take control of their destinies and subjugate them.

    So in answer to the question about the causes of the Democrats’ failure to stop the war, I say: they are the same reasons which led to the failure of former president Kennedy to stop the Vietnam war. Those with real power and influence are those with the most capital. And since the democratic system permits major corporations to back candidates, be they presidential or congressional, there shouldn’t be any cause for astonishment - and there isn’t any - in the Democrats’ failure to stop the war. And you’re the ones who have the saying which goes, “Money talks.” And I tell you: after the failure of your representatives in the Democratic Party to implement your desire to stop the war, you can still carry anti-war placards and spread out in the streets of major cities, then go back to your homes, but that will be of no use and will lead to the prolonging of the war.

    However, there are two solutions for stopping it. The first is from our side, and it is to continue to escalate the killing and fighting against you. That is our duty, and our brothers are carrying it out, and I ask Allah to grant them resolve and victory. And the second solution is from your side. It has now become clear to you and the entire world the impotence of the democratic system and how it plays with the interests of the peoples and their blood by sacrificing soldiers and populations to achieve the interests of the major corporations.

    And with that, it has become clear to all that they are the real tyrannical terrorists. In fact, the life of all of mankind is in danger because of the global warming resulting to a large degree from the emissions of the factories of the major corporations, yet despite that, the representative of these corporations in the White House insists on not observing the Kyoto accord, with the knowledge that the statistic speaks of the death and displacement of the millions of human beings because of that, especially in Africa. This greatest of plagues and most dangerous of threats to the lives of humans is taking place in an accelerating fashion as the world is being dominated by the democratic system, which confirms its massive failure to protect humans and their interests from the greed and avarice of the major corporations and their representatives.

    And despite this brazen attack on the people, the leaders of the West - especially Bush, Blair, Sarkozy and Brown - still talk about freedom and human rights with a flagrant disregard for the intellects of human beings. So is there a form of terrorism stronger, clearer and more dangerous than this? This is why I tell you: as you liberated yourselves before from the slavery of monks, kings, and feudalism, you should liberate yourselves form the deception, shackles and attrition of the capitalist system.

    If you were to ponder it well, you would find that in the end, it is a system harsher and fiercer than your systems in the Middle Ages. The capitalist system seeks to turn the entire world into a fiefdom of the major corporations under the label of “globalization” in order to protect democracy.

    And Iraq and Afghanistan and their tragedies; and the reeling of many of you under the burden of interest-related debts, insane taxes and real estate mortgages; global warming and its woes; and the abject poverty and tragic hunger in Africa: all of this is but one side of this global system.

    So it is imperative that you free yourselves from all of that and search for an alternative, upright methodology in which it is not the business of any class of humanity to lay down its own laws to its own advantage at the expense of the other classes as is the case with you, since the essence of man-made positive laws is that they serve the interests of those with the capital and thus make the rich richer and the poor poorer.

    The infallible methodology is the methodology of Allah, the Most High, who created the heavens and earth and created the Creation and is the Most Kind and All-Informed and the Knower of the souls of His slaves and the methodology that best suits them.

    You believe with absolute certainty that you believe in Allah, and you are full of conviction of this belief, so much that you have written this belief of yours on your dollar.

    But the truth is that you are mistaken in this belief of yours. The impartial judge knows that belief in Allah requires straightness in the following of His methodology, and accordingly, total obedience must be to the orders and prohibitions of Allah Alone in all aspects of life.

    So how about you when you associate others with Him in your beliefs and separate state from religion, then claim that you are believers?!

    What you have done is clear loss and manifest polytheism, and I will give you a parable of polytheism, as parables summarize and clarify speech.

    I tell you: its parable is the parable of a man who owns a shop and hires a worker and tells him, “Sell and give me the money,” but he makes sales and gives the money to someone other than the owner. So who of you would approve of that?

    You believe that Allah is your Lord and your Creator and the Creator of this earth and that it is His property, then you work on His earth and property without His orders and without obeying Him, and you legislate in contradiction to His Law and methodology.

    This work of yours is the greatest form of polytheism and is rebellion against obedience to Allah with which the believer becomes an unbeliever, even if he obeys Allah in some of his other orders. Allah, the Most High, sent down His orders in His Sacred Books like the Torah and Evangel and sent with them the Messengers (Allah’s prayers and peace be upon them) as bearers of good news to the people.

    And everyone who believes in them and complies with them is a believer from the people of the Garden. Then when the men of knowledge altered the words of Allah, the Most High, and sold them for a paltry price, as the rabbis did with the Torah and the monks with the Evangel, Allah sent down his final Book, the magnificent Quran, and safeguarded it from being added to or subtracted from by the hands of men, and in it is a complete methodology for the lives of all people.

    And our holding firm to this magnificent Book is the secret of our strength and winning of the war against you despite the fewness of our numbers and materiel.

    And if you would like to get to know some of the reasons for your losing of your war against us, then read the book of Michael Scheuer in this regard.

    Don’t be turned away from Islam by the terrible situation of the Muslims today, for our rulers in general abandoned Islam many decades ago, but our forefathers were the leaders and pioneers of the world for many centuries, when they held firmly to Islam.

    And before concluding, I tell you: there has been an increase in the thinkers who study events and happenings, and on the basis of their study, they have declared the approach of the collapse of that American Empire.

    Among them is the European banker who anticipated the fall of the Soviet Union, which indeed fell. And it would benefit you to read what he wrote about what comes after the empire in regard to the United States of America. I also want to bring to your attention that among the greatest reasons for the collapse of the Soviet Union was their being afflicted with their leader Brezhnev, who was overtaken by pride and arrogance and refused to look at the facts on the ground. From the first year of the Afghanistan invasion, reports indicated that the Russians were losing the war, but he refused to acknowledge this, lest it go down in his personal history as a defeat, even though refusal to acknowledge defeat not only doesn’t do anything to change the facts for thinking people, but also exacerbates the problem and increases the losses. And how similar is your position today to their position approximately two decades ago. The mistakes of Brezhnev are being repeated by Bush, who - when asked about the date of his withdrawing of forces from Iraq - said in effect that the withdrawal will not be during his reign, bur rather, during the reign of the one who succeeds him. And the significance of those words is not hidden.

    And here I say: it would benefit you to listen to the poignant messages of your soldiers in Iraq, who are paying - with their blood, nerves and scattered limbs - the price for these sorts of irresponsible statements. Among them is the eloquent message of Joshua which he sent by way of the media, in which he wipes the tears from his eyes and describes American politicians in harsh terms and invites them to join him there for a few days. Perhaps his message will find in you an attentive year so you can rescue him and more than 150,000 of your sons there who are tasting the two bitterest things:

    If they leave their barracks, the mines devour them, and if they refuse to leave, rulings are passed against them. Thus the only options left in front of them are to commit suicide or cry, both of which are from the severest of afflictions. So is there anything more men can do after crying and killing themselves to make you respond to them? They are doing that out of the severity of the humiliation, fear and terror which they are suffering. It is severer than what the slaves used to suffer at your hands centuries ago, and it is as if some of them have gone from one slavery to another slavery more severe and harmful, even if it be in the fancy dress of the Defense Department’s financial enticements.

    So do you feel the greatness of their sufferings?

    To conclude, I invite you to embrace Islam, for the greatest mistake one can make in this world and one which is uncorrectable is to die while not surrendering to Allah, the Most High, in all aspects of one’s life - i.e. to die outside of Islam. And Islam means gain for you in this first life and the next, final life. The true religion is a mercy for people in their lives, filling their hearts with serenity and calm.

    There is a message for you in the Mujahideen: the entire world is in pursuit of them, yet their hearts, by the grace of Allah, are satisfied and tranquil. The true religion also puts peoples’ lives in order with its laws; protects their needs and interests; refines their goals; protects them from evils; and guarantees for them entrance into Paradise in the hereafter through their obedience to Allah and sincere worship of Him Alone.

    And it will also achieve your desire to stop the war as a consequence, because as soon as the warmongering owners of the major corporations realize that you have lost confidence in your democratic system and begun to search for an alternative, and that this alternative is Islam, they will run to you to please you and achieve what you want to steer you away from Islam. So your true compliance with Islam will deprive them of the opportunity to defraud the peoples and take their money under numerous pretexts, like arms deals and so on.

    There are no taxes in Islam, but rather there is a limited Zakat (alms) totaling only 2.5%. So beware of the deception of those with the capital. And with your earnest reading about Islam from its pristine sources, you will arrive at an important truth, which is that the religion of all of the Prophets (peace and blessings of Allah be upon them) is one, and that its essence is submission to the orders of Allah Alone in all aspects of life, even if their Shari’ahs [Laws] differ.

    And did you know that the name of the Prophet of Allah Jesus and his mother (peace and blessings of Allah be on them both) are mentioned in the Noble Quran dozens of times, and that in the Quran there is a chapter whose name is “Maryam,” i.e. Mary, daughter of ‘Imran and mother of Jesus (peace and blessings of Allah be upon them both)? It tells the story of her becoming pregnant with the Prophet of Allah Jesus (peace and blessings of Allah be upon them both), and in its confirmation of her chastity and purity, in contrast to the fabrications of the Jews against her. Whoever wishes to find that out for himself must listen to the verse of this magnificent chapter: one of the just kings of the Christians - the Negus - listened to some of its verses and his eyes welled up with tears and he said something which should be reflected on for a long time by those sincere in their search for the truth.

    He said, “verily, this and what Jesus brought come from one lantern”: i.e. that the magnificent Quran and the Evangel are both from Allah, the Most High; and every just and intelligent one of you who reflects of the Quran will definitely arrive at this truth. It also must be noted that Allah has preserved the Quran from the alterations of man. And reading in order to become acquainted with Islam only requires a little effort, and those of you who are guided will profit greatly. And peace be upon he who follows the Guidance.

    The End

    ——

    Transcription provided for your interest. This website does not condone the actions of Al-Qaeda.

    *

     

    Translation from Wolf Pangloss
    http://tinyurl.com/22ly7d

    http://wolfpangloss.wordpress.com/2007/09/07/text-of-bin-laden-speech/

    Bush, Bin Laden & Grey Hair

    bushbinladen.jpg
    Did Osama Bin Laden & President Bush swap hairdos?

    To go grey or not to go grey, that is the question.

    Bush and Bin Laden have an obvious disagreements on many issues, even when it comes to hair color. With the release of another video, Osama Bin Laden shows that the enemy is indeed adaptive, particularly when it comes to hair. While the President has allowed self-created stress to kill the rich brown color in his fine-combed locks, the world’s most wanted man has chosen to attack his dying facial fur with a dark hue injection.

    It is possible, however, that Bush and Bin Laden have a symbiotic relationship.

    With all the conspiracies out there about 9/11 and Bush family ties to the Saudi royal family, it is difficult to determine if the internet can sustain another. Let’s take that chance:

    Did President Bush and Osama Bin Laden trade hair?

    Far fetched? Possibly, but ties between the Bush family and the Saudi’s are well known.

    saudi.jpg

    We also know that hair swapping isn’t always what it seems to be.

    The New York Times reported earlier this week that 80% of hair donated to Locks of Love is often thrown away, and according to NBC5, “Locks of Love sends the best of the hair it receives to a wig manufacturer in California called Taylormade Hair Replacement, which whittles down the selection further, rejecting up to half.”

    With 90% of hair rejected, it may be no wonder that the world’s major players tend to share their hair follicles along with national resources. It would certainly answer the question as to why an exchange of this nature took place.


    Botched early attempt?

    If Bush and Bin Laden did swap hair, the questions remaining are when, how, and possibly where?

    When must have been in the last few years based on early pictures we have of them both. How is certainly left to the scientific community. Where is most likely somewhere in the mountains of Pakistan (according to the latest guesses), but they certainly didn’t have to meet in order for the exchange to occur. Or did they?

    The answer to these questions remain unseen. One thing is certain, Osama needs a new wardrobe, and Bush’s wardrobe needs some editing:

    Perhaps another exchange?

    *

    See also: Is it Live, Or is it Al-Qaeda?

     

    http://tinyurl.com/2zuq8q, http://www.thesmokehammer.com/images/bush_head2.jpg,
    http://www.hotconflict.com/blog/2007/09/new-osama-bin-l.html,
    http://www.new-enlightenment.com/BushSaud.htm
    http://www.bushwatch.com/bushcarlyle.jpg, http://www.teddwebb.com/tickle_me/war_on_terror/gw-bush-osama.jpg
    http://www.blogtendances.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/bush_crocs.jpg

    Another 9/11 Helps US?

    Stu Bykofsky believes another 9/11 type attack would unite America“To save America, we need another 9/11″

    The approaching anniversary of the September 11th, 2001 terrorist attacks has gotten many of us thinking about terrorism, America, foreign policy, and 9/11 itself. With reflections on 9/11 by numerous columnists expected any day now, Stu Bykofsky is quick out of the gate with a ponderous suggestion.

    Bykofsky writes in his August 9, 2007 Philadelphia Daily News column that another 9/11-type attack is needed to bring a fractured America together again.

    Why would he suggest that? Because Bykofsky is “sick of how splintered we are politically - thanks mainly to our ineptitude in Iraq - that we have forgotten who the enemy is.”

    The combination of an obtuse-minded president, an unnecessary war, four years of occupying a country not connected with the 9/11 attacks, and the incompetent management of Iraqi and American peoples’ interests has drained America’s patience and spirit. Bipartisan bickering and in-party squabbling has left the American electorate frustrated with their representatives and aching for a feel-good moment.

    A bullet-point summary of Bykofsky’s argument in own words:

    • There is the drip of daily casualties and victory is not around the corner.
    • America likes wars shorter than the World Series
    • We like fast food and fast war
    • Bush I did everything right, Bush II did everything wrong - but he did it with the backing of Congress
    • Democrats and Republicans are attacking one another, when they aren’t attacking themselves.
    • The dialog of discord echoes across America
    • Turn back to 9/11
    • Remember the community of outrage and national resolve?
    • We knew who the enemy was shortly after 9/11
    • What would sew us back together?
    • Another 9/11 attack.

    Offering possible targets, Bykofsky suggests South Dakota’s Mount Rushmore, the San Francisco Golden Gate Bridge, Wrigley Field in Chicago, and the Philadelphia subway system.

    pics.jpg

    While acknowledging that American unity formed in the aftermath of such an attack would be finite, Bykofsky’s suggestion is a disturbingly curious one. Do Americans (or people in general) require loss to seek a unison of resolve? Is a common enemy the only way to bring our country together? Do we even need to be unified?

    The first casualty in the aftermath of 9/11 was the potential for global good.

    The wake of world support for the United States of America after 9/11 was unlike any other in history. And, like many great events, timing is everything.

    For a few moments in the great chronology of human events America had the opportunity to truly change the world. In that brief period, our government had a real chance to lead, to inspire, to mend long ills, unite old enemies, tackle difficult issues, and help evolve our species.

    We had potential.

    We had the wrong leader.

    What wears on the souls of Americans (and the popularity polls of the Bush administration) is the lack of positive outcome from our great loss. Americans love the come-back kid and the triumphant underdog. We can take our lumps, but we expect a positive resolution in the end. Clearly or unclearly, the Bush administration saw this window of opportunity for the advancement of American goals and promptly stumbled on its own hubris.

    Right time, wrong mission.

    The narrow-minded focus of our administration limited the potential of what was possible to military and political objectives. If your only tool is a military everything looks like war.

    But the seeking out and reigning justice on murderous terrorists is not in question. The heart of the issue is the path to Iraq our leaders chose to seduce us down on the wave of global sentiment, and the fact that we followed so readily.

    Did President Bush for even an instant consider using global good-will to tackle world hunger? What about genocide? Wouldn’t that have been a nice time for a Mid-East peace summit?

    The issue brought forth in Bykofsky’s article harkens back and unearths the brotherly global mindset shared by much of the world in the wake of 9/11; the global mindset that created paths of possibilities that did not exist before, paths that America had the chance to exploit.

    For good or ill, America had a wingman.

    We chose ill, and the ‘greatest nation’ squandered a historic opportunity for greatness.

    If better choices had been made and our military quickly extirpated from Iraq after the aircraft carrier victory speech, America would have had some type of resolution. Even with the Iraq invasion ill-advised from the outset, an awkward and misdirected resolution to the 9/11 attacks would have been better than our current situation.

    No amount of guns, money or American blood can replace the lost potential now. If at Midnight tonight the insurgents gave up, the Iraqi government united, troops started coming home, and America claimed utter victory, the poison of poor decisions would still linger in the vein. Sadly the pain was predictable and is now growing unbearable.

    Stu Bykofsky is wrong in suggesting another 9/11 type attack would unify the country.

    Even though we live in a country that bases much of its power on a massive military budget, many of us were unprepared for the 9/11 attack. The real ’shock and awe’ was felt by the American people at the attack on our own soil, especially to those ignorant to the effects of American foreign policy.


    U.S. Federal Budget 2008 fiscal year

    Republican presidential candidate Rudolph Guiliani is a prime example, spearheading that type of ignorant thought, as demonstrated here in the second Republican presidential debate.

    The type of unity Bykofsky reminisces for is not possible anymore, but a new type of unity is sure to come in the future.

    Another 9/11 type attack would further splinter our government and citizens, for Americans no longer believe our current president will respond appropriately with the best decisions. Through his own choices, our leader is no longer a symbol of victory. Deservedly or not, our leader is now seen by many as a joke, a fraud, and a menace.

    Only though new leadership can America unite in the way Bykofsky and so many of us long for. It is partially for this reason that the 2008 presidential election season has started so early, so few candidates have given praise to President Bush, and why the idea of ‘change’ is as popular this election cycle as it ever has been.


    Presidential candidates with Change as their main theme:
    Democratic Senator Barack Obama & Republican Congressman Ron Paul

    *

    UPDATE: Stu Bykofsky’s article mentioned on the Colbert Report, September 12, 2007 (a month late there, Colbert)

    See also

    http://media.philly.com/images/80*82/stubykofsky.jpg, http://tinyurl.com/ytfms5
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/35/Wtc-2004-memorial.jpg

    http://photos.freenewmexican.com/2007/07/01/54629_375×375.jpg
    http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/ronpaul.jpg

    Ron Paul Matchup: Boba Fett vs. Bin Laden

    boba3.jpg

    H.R. 3216: Ron Paul seeks bounty hunters to track down Osama Bin Laden

    According to the Politico,

    Paul has offered legislation (H.R. 3216) to authorize Bush to issue “letters of marquee and reprisal” to those private citizens or entities that want “to seize outside the geographic boundaries of the United States and its territories the person and property of Osama bin Laden, of any al Qaeda co-conspirator, and of any conspirator with Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda who are responsible for the air piratical aggressions and depredations perpetrated upon the United States of America on September 11, 2001,” or future attacks.

    Paul offered this proposal back in October 2001, arguing that it would allow “Congress to authorize the President to specifically target Bin Laden and his associates using non-government armed forces. Since it is nearly impossible for U.S. intelligence teams to get close to Bin Laden, the marque and reprisal approach creates an incentive for people in Afghanistan or elsewhere to turn him over to the [United States].”

    However, these types of bounty hunting commissions were outlawed in 1856 by the Treaty of Paris, ending the Crimean War.

    While the United States was not a party to that treaty, and the Confederate States of America issued such letters during the Civil War, they are pretty much an anachronism.

    boba2.jpg

    Poor bounty hunters.

    Sorry Bobba Fett. Sorry Bossk, Dengar and Greedo. Sorry Aurra Sing, Zuckuss, and DOG. Progress denies you your wacky ways.

    boba1.jpg

    See also:

    http://lukoagency.free.fr/images/Jeremy%20Bulloch/co-Boba03.jpg
    http://www.ocolly.okstate.edu/issues/2001_Fall/011011/pix/1.%20OSAMA%20BIN%20LADEN.jpg
    http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2006/Jan-16-Mon-2006/photos/5bounty.jpg
    http://www.theadvocates.org/celebrities/images/ron-paul2.jpg
    http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/I/51H6XCT469L._AA240_.jpg
    http://cooperativeresearch.org/events-images/099_malaysia_meeting_2050081722-8286.jpg

    Gentle Reminder

    Rights removed after 9/11

    We’ve still got a long way to go…

    *

    More on 9/11

    Possible Prison for Ground Zero Responders

    9/11 First Responders could go to jail for traveling to Cuba in “SICKO”

    Traveling with Michael Moore to Cuba for (free) health care unavailable in the States, 9/11 first responders highlighted in the new film “SICKO” could be facing jail time.

    Ug.

    *

    Category: 911


    subscribe.jpg

    Subscribe by Email. Just enter your email address:

    Latest Posts & Links

    Archive