Garling Gauge

An Unpopular Approach to Alternative Energy

Gov. Rendell shuts down state government in hopes of securing an alternative energy future

According to this July 9, 2007 AP article, Democratic governor Ed. Rendell is locked in a budget stalemate with the Republican led Legislature of Pennsylvania. The impasse has forced a government shutdown of many nonessential state services.

Part of the disagreement hinges on Rendell’s energy plan for the state. According to AP:

“The centerpiece of Rendell’s energy plan would place a surcharge on electricity use for a fund for alternative energy programs and electricity conservation. Republican legislators and some Democrats oppose the surcharge and accused the governor of holding state employees hostage to force them to approve it.”

Critics further insist that with a $650 million surplus, state employees and those seeking state services should not have to suffer over what is viewed as a partisan debate.

Unfortunately, this type of criticism will occur more often as our political leaders take the difficult steps required to secure a future of alternative energy.

By shutting down the state government to force a budget deal, Gov. Rendell is taking a national lead in emphasizing the future importance of alternative energy.

This is responsible and forward-looking.

Just because a budget deal could be reached without the energy plan does not mean it should be. Just because you can do something does not mean you should do it.

When would be a better time to address the issue of alternative energy and conservation? When there is no budget surplus? Should the governor wait until there are more democrats in the Legislature? No. The time to address this issue is now, even under difficult circumstances.

It’s a good thing there is an adult in the governor’s mansion.
Grow up Republicans, grow up.